header-logo header-logo

Practice—Appeal—CPR 39.3

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Bank of Scotland v Pereira and others [2011] EWCA Civ 241, [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 9 Mar 2011

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, issued guidance in relation to a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and an attempt to appeal against that order.

Joanna Shaw (instructed by Paul Smith & Co) for the first defendant. Gary Lidington (instructed by Aldridge and Brownlee) for the the second and third defendants.

An order was made on 21 June 2007 (the 2007 order), against the first defendant, in her absence. She applied to set aside parts of the order, pursuant to CPR 39.3. The judge dismissed the application and she appealed. She also sought permission to appeal against the 2007 order itself.

Lord Neuberger MR:

While the purpose of CPR 39.3 was readily apparent, the relationship between a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and any attempt to appeal against the order, was more difficult. There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll