header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Appeal—CPR 39.3

Bank of Scotland v Pereira and others [2011] EWCA Civ 241, [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Lloyd and Gross LJJ, 9 Mar 2011

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, issued guidance in relation to a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and an attempt to appeal against that order.

Joanna Shaw (instructed by Paul Smith & Co) for the first defendant. Gary Lidington (instructed by Aldridge and Brownlee) for the the second and third defendants.

An order was made on 21 June 2007 (the 2007 order), against the first defendant, in her absence. She applied to set aside parts of the order, pursuant to CPR 39.3. The judge dismissed the application and she appealed. She also sought permission to appeal against the 2007 order itself.

Lord Neuberger MR:

While the purpose of CPR 39.3 was readily apparent, the relationship between a defendant’s application under CPR 39.3 to set aside an order, and any attempt to appeal against the order, was more difficult. There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll