header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE OF ACTION—ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY

Reader and others v Molesworths Bright Clegg Solicitors (a firm) [2007] EWCA Civ 169

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Smith and Moses LJJ
2 March 2007

Where a personal injury claim brought by a claimant before his death has been discontinued after his death, a dependency claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) is not thereby extinguished.

Christopher Limb (instructed by AST Hampsons) for the claimants.
Bernard Livesey QC and George Spalton (instructed by Weightmans) for the defendant.

The proceedings arose out of the personal injury suffered in 1989 by Peter Reader, the father of the claimants. His injury was caused by the negligence of Roy Cordingly.

Reader consulted the defendant solicitors, who issued proceedings on his behalf. In December 1994, however, Reader committed suicide. On his death, his cause of action was transmitted to his estate by operation of law. He died intestate.

The defendants, not acting on instructions, wrote to Cordingly’s solicitors informing them of Reader’s death and stating that the action should be discontinued.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll