header-logo header-logo

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE OF ACTION—ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Reader and others v Molesworths Bright Clegg Solicitors (a firm) [2007] EWCA Civ 169

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Smith and Moses LJJ
2 March 2007

Where a personal injury claim brought by a claimant before his death has been discontinued after his death, a dependency claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) is not thereby extinguished.

Christopher Limb (instructed by AST Hampsons) for the claimants.
Bernard Livesey QC and George Spalton (instructed by Weightmans) for the defendant.

The proceedings arose out of the personal injury suffered in 1989 by Peter Reader, the father of the claimants. His injury was caused by the negligence of Roy Cordingly.

Reader consulted the defendant solicitors, who issued proceedings on his behalf. In December 1994, however, Reader committed suicide. On his death, his cause of action was transmitted to his estate by operation of law. He died intestate.

The defendants, not acting on instructions, wrote to Cordingly’s solicitors informing them of Reader’s death and stating that the action should be discontinued.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll