header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE OF ACTION—ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY

Reader and others v Molesworths Bright Clegg Solicitors (a firm) [2007] EWCA Civ 169

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Smith and Moses LJJ
2 March 2007

Where a personal injury claim brought by a claimant before his death has been discontinued after his death, a dependency claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) is not thereby extinguished.

Christopher Limb (instructed by AST Hampsons) for the claimants.
Bernard Livesey QC and George Spalton (instructed by Weightmans) for the defendant.

The proceedings arose out of the personal injury suffered in 1989 by Peter Reader, the father of the claimants. His injury was caused by the negligence of Roy Cordingly.

Reader consulted the defendant solicitors, who issued proceedings on his behalf. In December 1994, however, Reader committed suicide. On his death, his cause of action was transmitted to his estate by operation of law. He died intestate.

The defendants, not acting on instructions, wrote to Cordingly’s solicitors informing them of Reader’s death and stating that the action should be discontinued.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll