header-logo header-logo

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE OF ACTION—ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURY

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Reader and others v Molesworths Bright Clegg Solicitors (a firm) [2007] EWCA Civ 169

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Longmore, Smith and Moses LJJ
2 March 2007

Where a personal injury claim brought by a claimant before his death has been discontinued after his death, a dependency claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) is not thereby extinguished.

Christopher Limb (instructed by AST Hampsons) for the claimants.
Bernard Livesey QC and George Spalton (instructed by Weightmans) for the defendant.

The proceedings arose out of the personal injury suffered in 1989 by Peter Reader, the father of the claimants. His injury was caused by the negligence of Roy Cordingly.

Reader consulted the defendant solicitors, who issued proceedings on his behalf. In December 1994, however, Reader committed suicide. On his death, his cause of action was transmitted to his estate by operation of law. He died intestate.

The defendants, not acting on instructions, wrote to Cordingly’s solicitors informing them of Reader’s death and stating that the action should be discontinued. The letter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll