header-logo header-logo

Practice — Evidence — Expert evidence

12 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Case law , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Rogers and another v Hoyle [2013] EWHC 1409 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 21 (Sep)

Queen’s Bench Division, Leggatt J, 25 May 2013

The High Court has reviewed the issue of admissibility of expert reports, in the context of a report by Air Accident Investigation Board of the Department for Transport (AAIB) which the claimant sought to adduce in evidence in a civil action against the defendant which alleged that the defendant pilot’s negligence caused the death of a passenger, of whom the claimants were the executors of the estate and the dependants.

John Kimbell (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the claimants. Timothy Marland (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the defendant.

In May 2011, a Tiger Moth aircraft piloted by the defendant crashed, killing its passenger. The claimants were the executors of the estate and the dependants of the deceased. They issued proceedings seeking compensation for his death. They alleged that the accident had been caused by the defendant’s negligence. The defendant’s case was that the accident had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll