header-logo header-logo

Practice—Permission to appeal—CPR 52

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269, [2011] All ER (D) 190 (Mar)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Hooper and Rimer LJJ, 16 Mar 2011

A prospective appellant who wishes to challenge the terms on which the judge grants permission to appeal should be required to apply to the appeal court for permission rather than challenging the terms.

Emma Dixon (instructed by Public Law Project) for the claimant. Clive Lewis QC and Joanne Clement (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The claimant successfully brought proceedings for judicial review against the defendant (see [2010] All ER (D) 278 (Jul)). The defendant obtained permission to appeal against that decision, on terms that, whatever the outcome of the appeal: (i) the order for costs which the judge had made in respect of the proceedings remained undisturbed; and (ii) the defendant would pay the claimant’s costs of the appeal. The defendant appealed against, or sought an application, pursuant to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll