header-logo header-logo

Practice—Pre-trial or post judgment relief—Freezing orders

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1040

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward and Tomlinson LJJ, 1 Sept 2011

Both as a matter of principle and on authority a freezing order granted in aid of enforcement of an arbitration award ought ordinarily to contain an ordinary course of business exception.

Vernon Flynn QC and Tom Smith (instructed by Latham & Watkins Solicitors) for the appellant. Simon Salzedo QC and Tony Singla (instructed by Simmons & Simmons Solicitors) for the respondent.

The appellant, MTSF, was a Luxembourg company which was part of a wider group of telecommunication companies. The immediate parent of MTSF was MTS OJSC, a Russian company. MTSF had been set up purely to secure tax benefits to MTS OJSC. In 2005, the respondent, Nomihold, entered into a sale and purchase agreement with MTSF. After the parties fell out Nomihold began arbitration proceedings in London. It obtained an award in its favour in November 2010, in the sum of about $US208m. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll