header-logo header-logo

Pre-recorded evidence proves successful

13 April 2023
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The use of pre-recorded evidence has helped rape victims during trial, Ministry of Justice research has shown.

Pre-recorded evidence, one of the measures recommended by the Rape Review in 2021, allows victims and witnesses of crimes such as rape and modern slavery to have their cross-examination video-recorded as close to the time of the offence as possible and played later during the trial, subject to a successful application to the court. It has been available as a measure in all crown courts since September 2022.

According to research published this month, victims who have pre-recorded their evidence find the experience less intimidating as they do not have to face their alleged attacker in court. Other benefits included improved recall of events as a result of cross-examination being brought forward and because the victim knew exactly when they would need to give evidence as opposed to sometimes waiting in court for days to give their evidence. Victims were also able to access support services earlier, such as therapy.

Justice secretary Dominic Raab said the report showed pre-recorded evidence was ‘making an important and positive difference’.

Emily Hunt, independent Adviser to the Rape Review, said pre-recorded evidence ‘allows the most vulnerable and intimidated victims—like rape victims—to have an opportunity to move forward and move on more quickly from what has happened to them, while staying engaged in the process and it does so regardless of those in the system who would rather just keep doing things the way they’ve always been done’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll