header-logo header-logo

06 November 2026 / Sadie Whittam
Issue: 8184 / Categories: Features , Consumer , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Prediction markets: an insider’s game?

263033
© Getty images

Sadie Whittam uncovers a host of legal dangers in the popular trend for trading in predictions of specific events

Prediction markets are a rapidly growing global phenomenon, and Polymarket and Kalshi are the key players. Polymarket is a decentralised, crypto-native platform, whereas Kalshi is regulated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Prediction markets allow users to purchase event contracts on a whole range of topics, including pop culture, cryptocurrency, sporting outcomes and politics. Users purchase event contracts at a set price between 0.01 and 0.99 in the relevant currency. For example, if a user purchased an event contract at $0.92 on the question, ‘Will a New York Times front page headline use the term “blockade” this week?’, this indicates a 92% chance that this will happen. If a New York Times front page headline does use the term ‘blockade’, the market resolves to ‘Yes’, and those who bought the ‘Yes’ side of the event contract receive $1, while those who bought the ‘No’ side of the contract

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll