header-logo header-logo

Premium concerns

10 July 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Simon Young uncovers the truth behind rumours of increased premiums & unprofessional conduct

Last year saw unusually high levels of concern about the renewal of firms’ professional indemnity insurance policies. Not only were rises in premium levels worrying for some, but also there were rumblings about unprofessional conduct on the part of some brokers, with allegations of offers from insurers being deliberately withheld or delayed. There was concern as to the possibility of insurers themselves becoming insolvent, and worries about shrinkage of the market. There were also un-muted warnings of further increases this year (even before the collapse in the financial markets which means that such forecasts are almost bound to be correct). What then is now emerging as the truth behind those stories, and the prospects for this year?

Bring back SIF?

The main issue for many firms is the level of premiums. There were a number of firms which clearly underwent severe increases, which led to claims that the profession would have been better off had the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) been retained.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll