header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Premium concerns

Simon Young uncovers the truth behind rumours of increased premiums & unprofessional conduct

Last year saw unusually high levels of concern about the renewal of firms’ professional indemnity insurance policies. Not only were rises in premium levels worrying for some, but also there were rumblings about unprofessional conduct on the part of some brokers, with allegations of offers from insurers being deliberately withheld or delayed. There was concern as to the possibility of insurers themselves becoming insolvent, and worries about shrinkage of the market. There were also un-muted warnings of further increases this year (even before the collapse in the financial markets which means that such forecasts are almost bound to be correct). What then is now emerging as the truth behind those stories, and the prospects for this year?

Bring back SIF?

The main issue for many firms is the level of premiums. There were a number of firms which clearly underwent severe increases, which led to claims that the profession would have been better off had the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) been retained.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll