header-logo header-logo

Premium concerns

10 July 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Simon Young uncovers the truth behind rumours of increased premiums & unprofessional conduct

Last year saw unusually high levels of concern about the renewal of firms’ professional indemnity insurance policies. Not only were rises in premium levels worrying for some, but also there were rumblings about unprofessional conduct on the part of some brokers, with allegations of offers from insurers being deliberately withheld or delayed. There was concern as to the possibility of insurers themselves becoming insolvent, and worries about shrinkage of the market. There were also un-muted warnings of further increases this year (even before the collapse in the financial markets which means that such forecasts are almost bound to be correct). What then is now emerging as the truth behind those stories, and the prospects for this year?

Bring back SIF?

The main issue for many firms is the level of premiums. There were a number of firms which clearly underwent severe increases, which led to claims that the profession would have been better off had the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) been retained.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll