header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The price of pain

Should survivors of torture overseas be able to sue for damages in the UK courts? asks Richard Scorer

The draft Torture (Damages) Bill seeks to create an exception to the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) to enable victims of torture to bring civil claims in the UK courts against foreign states who perpetrate torture, and their officials. The Bill successfully passed its first reading in the House of Commons on 18 November 2008 and its supporters hope that with sufficient parliamentary time, the Bill will now be enacted into law. Why this legal change, and why now?

Underlying the Bill is the recognition that, currently, international legal prohibitions against torture are more honoured in the breach than the observance. Most governments in the world agree, in their official pronouncements, that torture is wrong, and have undertaken never to use it. These undertakings are formalised in the United Nations convention against torture, which came into force in 1987. The convention bans the use of torture in all circumstances including threats to national security. 144

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll