header-logo header-logo

The price of pain

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Should survivors of torture overseas be able to sue for damages in the UK courts? asks Richard Scorer

The draft Torture (Damages) Bill seeks to create an exception to the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) to enable victims of torture to bring civil claims in the UK courts against foreign states who perpetrate torture, and their officials. The Bill successfully passed its first reading in the House of Commons on 18 November 2008 and its supporters hope that with sufficient parliamentary time, the Bill will now be enacted into law. Why this legal change, and why now?

Underlying the Bill is the recognition that, currently, international legal prohibitions against torture are more honoured in the breach than the observance. Most governments in the world agree, in their official pronouncements, that torture is wrong, and have undertaken never to use it. These undertakings are formalised in the United Nations convention against torture, which came into force in 1987. The convention bans the use of torture in all circumstances including threats to national security. 144

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll