header-logo header-logo

Principle players

25 May 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Roger Smith rounds up recent human rights developments

The UN inches towards a statement of the principles and guidelines on access to justice in criminal matters. Its Commission for Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice adopted draft provisions in Vienna at the end of April. The Commission’s recommendation should be enough to see the guidelines formally agreed by the UN itself.

Criminal legal aid

The principles, which might become helpful to defenders of criminal legal aid from domestic cuts, require prompt access to legal aid at all stages of the criminal justice process. Paragraph 21 states that this is to be done: “Regardless of means, if the interests of justice so require, for example, given the urgency or complexity of the case or the severity of the potential penalty.”

Such a provision inhibits attempts by government to cut the police station duty solicitor scheme or to impose charges, as originally suggested in the Bill that became the Legal Aid, Punishment and Sentencing of Offenders Act (LASPO).

Interestingly, the process was led by two countries both

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll