header-logo header-logo

25 May 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Principle players

Roger Smith rounds up recent human rights developments

The UN inches towards a statement of the principles and guidelines on access to justice in criminal matters. Its Commission for Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice adopted draft provisions in Vienna at the end of April. The Commission’s recommendation should be enough to see the guidelines formally agreed by the UN itself.

Criminal legal aid

The principles, which might become helpful to defenders of criminal legal aid from domestic cuts, require prompt access to legal aid at all stages of the criminal justice process. Paragraph 21 states that this is to be done: “Regardless of means, if the interests of justice so require, for example, given the urgency or complexity of the case or the severity of the potential penalty.”

Such a provision inhibits attempts by government to cut the police station duty solicitor scheme or to impose charges, as originally suggested in the Bill that became the Legal Aid, Punishment and Sentencing of Offenders Act (LASPO).

Interestingly, the process was led by two countries both

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll