header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Prisoners

Tovey and others v Ministry of Justice [2011] EWHC 271 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 202 (Feb)

There were no reasonable grounds in domestic law for bringing a claim for damages or a declaration for being disenfranchised whilst a prisoner. Statute precluded it. Case law was against it. European authority was against the payment of compensatory damages in respect of it. A claim for a declaration was not hopeless, but difficult.

The fact the secretary of state (or the state) had not acted to remedy the contravention identified in Strasbourg authorities did not itself give rise to a claim for damages, because the express wording of statute prevented it. Even if he (or the state) had acted to fulfil the state’s obligations, it was far from certain that the second claimant himself would have had the vote, since there were many ways short of full prisoner enfranchisement which were capable of remedying the breach which the European Court had identified.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll