header-logo header-logo

The private road justice gap

17 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance surgery , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Judge backs compulsory third party insurance on private land

A High court Judge has backed the calls of a car crash victims’ charity for compulsory third-party insurance to be extended to vehicles on private land.

Delivering his judgment in RoadPeace v Secretary of State for Transport & Ors [2017] EWHC 2725 (Admin) last week, Mr Justice Ouseley agreed that domestic law should be changed to make insurance compulsory for an off-road vehicle driven in a way ‘consistent with its normal purpose’.

He said he saw ‘no reason why a declaration [of the incompatibility of domestic law with the EU Directive on Motor Insurance] should not be made’.

The EU Directive provides that compensation schemes should treat victims of uninsured drivers no less favourably than those of insured drivers. Under UK law, however, the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) will only compensate victims of uninsured drivers in circumstances where insurance was compulsory.

Despite backing legislative change, Ouseley J rejected RoadPeace’s argument that current UK legislation unlawfully excludes some victims from the protection of the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) and/or unlawfully restricts the amount of compensation they are entitled to.

Vijay Ganapathy, partner at Leigh Day, which acted for RoadPeace, said: ‘Many who have been injured by uninsured drivers of other types of vehicles such as farm tractors have been denied compensation by the MIB. Thankfully therefore this judgment means the MIB are less able to advance this argument.’

Motor insurance campaigner, solicitor Dr Nicholas Bevan welcomed the judgment but described it as ‘a curate’s egg’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll