header-logo header-logo

17 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance surgery , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The private road justice gap

Judge backs compulsory third party insurance on private land

A High court Judge has backed the calls of a car crash victims’ charity for compulsory third-party insurance to be extended to vehicles on private land.

Delivering his judgment in RoadPeace v Secretary of State for Transport & Ors [2017] EWHC 2725 (Admin) last week, Mr Justice Ouseley agreed that domestic law should be changed to make insurance compulsory for an off-road vehicle driven in a way ‘consistent with its normal purpose’.

He said he saw ‘no reason why a declaration [of the incompatibility of domestic law with the EU Directive on Motor Insurance] should not be made’.

The EU Directive provides that compensation schemes should treat victims of uninsured drivers no less favourably than those of insured drivers. Under UK law, however, the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) will only compensate victims of uninsured drivers in circumstances where insurance was compulsory.

Despite backing legislative change, Ouseley J rejected RoadPeace’s argument that current UK legislation unlawfully excludes some victims from the protection of the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) and/or unlawfully restricts the amount of compensation they are entitled to.

Vijay Ganapathy, partner at Leigh Day, which acted for RoadPeace, said: ‘Many who have been injured by uninsured drivers of other types of vehicles such as farm tractors have been denied compensation by the MIB. Thankfully therefore this judgment means the MIB are less able to advance this argument.’

Motor insurance campaigner, solicitor Dr Nicholas Bevan welcomed the judgment but described it as ‘a curate’s egg’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper strengthens international disputes team with appointment of leading arbitration partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens trust and estates disputes team with new appointments

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law strengthens employment disputes and international advisory capability with senior associate appointment

NEWS
More than 500 former rugby players can pursue brain injury claims despite serious failures to disclose documents ordered by the High Court
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
back-to-top-scroll