header-logo header-logo

Privilege in peril?

24 February 2017 / John Gould
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_gould

Is legal professional privilege at risk of losing its status as a certain & absolute right? John Gould reports

 
  • A statute can override legal professional privilege but Parliament’s intention to do so must be clear.

  • The distinction, illustrated in Avonwick , between the right to obtain privileged information and the right to use it is an important one.

  • The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 could mean that there is no certainty that privileged communications will not be intercepted or used.

The rule of law requires that individuals can obtain legal advice in private. The risk that a policeman is listening to a client’s discussions with his lawyer may stop an individual consulting a lawyer at all, or at least prevent him from giving a full and frank account to his lawyer. An individual, alone, without an effective lawyer in possession of the full facts, may not be able to obtain the justice the law provides.

Lord Taylor in R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex p B [1996] AC 487, [1995] 4 All ER 526, described

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll