header-logo header-logo

Privilege in peril?

24 February 2017 / John Gould
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7735_gould

Is legal professional privilege at risk of losing its status as a certain & absolute right? John Gould reports

 
  • A statute can override legal professional privilege but Parliament’s intention to do so must be clear.

  • The distinction, illustrated in Avonwick , between the right to obtain privileged information and the right to use it is an important one.

  • The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 could mean that there is no certainty that privileged communications will not be intercepted or used.

The rule of law requires that individuals can obtain legal advice in private. The risk that a policeman is listening to a client’s discussions with his lawyer may stop an individual consulting a lawyer at all, or at least prevent him from giving a full and frank account to his lawyer. An individual, alone, without an effective lawyer in possession of the full facts, may not be able to obtain the justice the law provides.

Lord Taylor in R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex p B [1996] AC 487, [1995] 4 All ER 526, described

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll