header-logo header-logo

Procedure trumps merits

11 June 2014 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Recent costs case law suggests a conflict between process & the determination of rights & wrongs, says Dominic Regan

Procedural rules should be the servant and not master of the rule of law. So said Lord Phillips in NML Capital v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31, [2011] 4 All ER 1191. The recent run of authorities starting with Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430 itself suggest something rather different. An unforgiven breach can have massive impact upon the determination of rights and wrongs. 

Durrant

Durrant v Chief Constable Of Avon & Somerset Constabulary [2013] EWCA Civ 1624, [2014] 2 All ER 757 was a hefty action listed for a five day trial. Allegations of racial discrimination, among other matters, were levelled against a total of 14 police officers. The defendant, in breach of a clear unless order, missed the deadline for service of witness statements, albeit by less than 24 hours. Sadly, the defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll