header-logo header-logo

Proceed with caution!

02 April 2009 / Jenny Pattison
Issue: 7363 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Terms&conditions , Property
printer mail-detail

Jenny Pattison on letters of intent in the construction industry

Where a project needs to proceed without delay, letters of intent can form a useful temporary solution permitting a contractor to start the preparatory and/or main works, pre-order materials and instruct sub-contractors/suppliers before the formal building contract has been concluded. The recent case of Diamond Build Limited v Clapham Park Homes [2008] EWHC 1439, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Jun) provides a timely reminder to proceed with caution in agreeing the terms of such a letter, to monitor the progress of the instructed works, and most crucially, to agree and execute the formal building contract at the earliest opportunity.

Types of letter of intent

A letter of intent requires a contractor to commence work pending formalisation of the building contract. The court in British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Company [1981], [1984] 1 All ER 504 outlined three possible categories:

  •   
    ●     a “letter of comfort” expressing an intention to enter into a formal building contract in the future;
  •   
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll