header-logo header-logo

23 June 2015
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Professor Sean Murphy & Professor Christian Tams—Matrix

Renowned public international lawyers join chambers

Matrix has announced that Professor Sean D. Murphy and Professor Christian J. Tams, international law chair at the University of Glasgow have joined chambers as associate members with immediate effect.

Professor Murphy teaches, writes and practices in the fields of public international law and US foreign relations law. Formerly legal counsellor at the US Embassy in The Hague, and US agent to the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, Sean has argued cases before the International Court of Justice, and appeared as counsel or expert in arbitrations convened under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. He was elected as a member of the UN International Law Commission in 2011, where he serves as special rapporteur for Crimes against Humanity.

Professor Tams teaches, writes and practices in the fields of public international law and international arbitration. His particular specialisms are inter-state litigation, state responsibility/state immunity, investment treaty disputes, and international sports law. Christian has acted in cases before the International Court of Justice, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Iran-US Claims Tribunal as well as in investment disputes. A qualified German lawyer, he is also a member of the German Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Professor Philippe Sands QC of Matrix says: “We are truly delighted to welcome Christian and Sean as new members at Matrix Chambers. Both are extraordinarily accomplished international law scholars and seasoned practitioners: experienced and independent, pragmatic and creative, each adds a new dimension to the membership of chambers.”

Lindsay Scott, CEO of Matrix says: “I am delighted that two such eminent academics and practitioners of public international law have decided to join Matrix International. They will further enhance our group of prominent experts who practice worldwide in this area.”

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll