header-logo header-logo

05 February 2015 / David Greene
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Profit & loss

greene

With the hike in court fees the government will make money at the expense of justice, says David Greene

It’s that time of year again; the annual hike in court fees to achieve the oft-stated goal of making the courts pay for themselves or, as some may see it, making the less well-off pay for our civil justice process. This year, however, there is a difference. It lies deep in s 180 of the Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. Civil court fees and crime may seem an odd mix but the Act is one of those modern legislative behemoths that is home to a disparate group of legislative hangers on. Much like the Consumer Rights Bill now on ping-pong from Commons to Lords.

Sea change

Section 180 marks a sea change in court fees because, contrary to established policy, it allows the Lord Chancellor to make a profit out of the fees charged for seeking the public court to resolve a dispute, or again as some might put it, securing access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll