header-logo header-logo

Property derivatives come of age

07 August 2008 / Gordon Peery , Andrew Petersen
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The growth of interest in property derivatives should not be a surprise, say Andrew Petersen and Gordon Peery

It is an interesting time for property and the markets in which participants buy, sell and finance property around the world.

A property down cycle began in 2008, however, the property finance story is not one of complete doom and gloom. Throughout 2008, tremendous growth of a relatively new derivative instrument has been witnessed, that enables investors and portfolio managers to gain immediate exposure to property or hedge property risk without buying or selling property. Property derivatives have been launched in the past, debuting on the London Futures and Options Exchange in the early 1990s. But due to a combination of bad timing and scandal over false trades (designed to create the impression of higher activity) their launch crashed. Despite this initial failure and despite the ongoing credit crunch biting, proponents of the property derivative market are optimistic, buoyed by a period of record trades in the property derivatives market (currently a trillion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll