header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026 / Fern Schofield , Gwyneth Everson
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Housing
printer mail-detail

Property law brief: quarterly review (May 2026)

249001
© Shutterstock

Fern Schofield & Gwyneth Everson provide a round-up of recent decisions, offering practical guidance on possession claims, statutory interpretation & evidential pitfalls

  • Recent decisions clarify key aspects of property law, including the status of mixed-use premises as ‘dwellings’, the limits of digital communications in transferring interests, and the interpretation of telecoms Code agreements.
  • The courts also reinforce proper procedure and evidential requirements in possession and ownership disputes.

For the first quarterly update of 2026, we consider a selection of significant decisions in property law from December 2025 through to February 2026. These cases highlight important developments in substantive law, clarify some key issues in possession claims, and provide valuable guidance on procedure and evidence.

Developments in substantive law

Cloisters Business Centre Management Company Ltd v Anvari [2026] EWCA Civ 17

The Court of Appeal determined that mixed-use premises are capable of constituting a ‘dwelling’ within the meaning of s 38 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), such that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll