header-logo header-logo

Proportionality refined?

21 August 2019 / Adam Grant
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
Adam Grant reflects on a long wait for clarity & the brave new world of refined proportionality assessments
  • In West, the court has given guidance as to the approach which should be adopted when assessing proportionality. 

The Court of Appeal has, after a six-year wait, finally provided some much-needed guidance on the application of the ‘new’ proportionality rules which were ushered in by the Jackson Reforms in 2013. 

Echoing what the costs profession has known for many years, the Court of Appeal conceded in West v Stockport NHS Foundation Trust; Demouilpied v Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

[2019] EWCA Civ 1220, [2019] All ER (D) 130 (Jul) that there was an absence of consistency in the way in which bills of costs are assessed. The wider ruling attracted significant attention as the culmination of the lengthy dispute between NHS Resolution and the ATE (after the event) insurers over clinical negligence premiums, however, it is the decisions on proportionality that will have a more widespread practical impact.

From a standard

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll