header-logo header-logo

12 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Protecting the castle

nlj_7656_hoare

Could conservation wishes change property law, asks Brie Stevens-Hoare QC

We say “an Englishman’s home is his castle” demonstrating our strong connection to land we own. We resist interference with our control over our own property. This was exemplified recently by the painting of candy stripes on a multi-million pound Kensington property. However, at the same time, we enjoy the few wide open spaces we have and some of the best architectural and/or historic buildings in the world. The need to preserve our physical heritage, the land and the buildings, is probably better understood now than it has ever been in the past.

Perpetual obligations

One way to protect what we value is to impose obligations on land that run with the land and therefore long into the future, through numerous generations. However, English law has long been resistant to the imposition of perpetual obligations on land. The law imposes strict pre-conditions that determine whether a covenant will run with the land to bind the covenantor’s successors in title and who can enforce the covenant. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll