header-logo header-logo

Protecting the castle

12 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7656_hoare

Could conservation wishes change property law, asks Brie Stevens-Hoare QC

We say “an Englishman’s home is his castle” demonstrating our strong connection to land we own. We resist interference with our control over our own property. This was exemplified recently by the painting of candy stripes on a multi-million pound Kensington property. However, at the same time, we enjoy the few wide open spaces we have and some of the best architectural and/or historic buildings in the world. The need to preserve our physical heritage, the land and the buildings, is probably better understood now than it has ever been in the past.

Perpetual obligations

One way to protect what we value is to impose obligations on land that run with the land and therefore long into the future, through numerous generations. However, English law has long been resistant to the imposition of perpetual obligations on land. The law imposes strict pre-conditions that determine whether a covenant will run with the land to bind the covenantor’s successors in title and who can enforce the covenant. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll