header-logo header-logo

21 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Protecting trade secrets

Employment lawyer raises questions over new EU legislation

New EU legislation to protect trade secrets has some “unclear” provisions that may require clarification by a judge and is not consistent in some areas with current UK law, an employment lawyer has warned.

Under the Trade Secrets Directive, a “trade secret” is defined as a secret that has commercial value and has been subject to reasonable steps to keep it secret by the person in control of the information. The Directive aims to counter the problem of trade secret theft and to harmonise the definition of “trade secret” to provide clear EU-wide protection. Currently, the law across member states is fragmented.

The Directive is due to be finally approved and adopted by March 2016. Member states then have two years to implement its provisions.

Christine Young, employment partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, says: “Companies operating across the EU will welcome a more unified approach.

“However, there are some downsides to the Directive. Some of the provisions are unclear and may require clarification as to their scope by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). There are also some areas where the Directive is not consistent with the current UK position on trade secrets.

“A hurdle for companies in the UK using the Directive is that they will need to show they have taken reasonable steps to keep the trade secret confidential. That is likely to require adequate contractual and physical protections to be put in place. This is a shift in emphasis from the UK common law approach.

“The carve-outs for whistle-blowers are also wider than the current UK legislation and the test for seeking injunctive relief is more involved than the current test.”

 
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll