header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Protection for vulnerable

Lord Chief Justice confirms plans for specialist judges

A “core group” of specially trained judges will be used for cases involving “significantly vulnerable” witnesses or serious sex cases likely to last more than 10 days, the Lord Chief Justice has confirmed.

In a letter to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, Lord Judge said such cases would be tried by a judge selected, on a case-by-case basis, by the resident judge and approved by a presiding judge. A list of judges likely to be selected is to be drawn up at each Crown Court. The Judicial College will then provide bespoke training on how best to conduct trials involving vulnerable witnesses and how to manage multi-defendant trials.

Judge Rook QC, who sits at the Old Bailey, has agreed to mentor the selected judges, while an ongoing initiative by Judge Arbuthnot, the deputy chief magistrate, aims to ensure cases involving very young witnesses come to trial within 12 weeks.

In June, the Home Affairs Committee called for specific guidance and training for judges in child sexual exploitation cases, and highlighted the risk of multiple defendants cross-examining vulnerable witnesses.

Earlier this month, a CPS barrister sparked public outrage by referring to a 13 year-old girl as “predatory” and “sexually experienced” during the sentencing of her 41 year-old abuser. A recent child prostitution case where a witness was cross-examined by seven barristers over 12 days has also caused alarm.

Lord Judge rejected the call for specialist courts to be used where children are required to give evidence, as this would lead to longer waiting times and would be expensive to set up and run. 

Baroness Deech, chair of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), welcomed the announcement, adding that the new Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates, being introduced next month, would assess advocate’s ability to deal with vulnerable witnesses.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll