header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Protection for vulnerable

Lord Chief Justice confirms plans for specialist judges

A “core group” of specially trained judges will be used for cases involving “significantly vulnerable” witnesses or serious sex cases likely to last more than 10 days, the Lord Chief Justice has confirmed.

In a letter to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, Lord Judge said such cases would be tried by a judge selected, on a case-by-case basis, by the resident judge and approved by a presiding judge. A list of judges likely to be selected is to be drawn up at each Crown Court. The Judicial College will then provide bespoke training on how best to conduct trials involving vulnerable witnesses and how to manage multi-defendant trials.

Judge Rook QC, who sits at the Old Bailey, has agreed to mentor the selected judges, while an ongoing initiative by Judge Arbuthnot, the deputy chief magistrate, aims to ensure cases involving very young witnesses come to trial within 12 weeks.

In June, the Home Affairs Committee called for specific guidance and training for judges in child sexual exploitation cases, and highlighted the risk of multiple defendants cross-examining vulnerable witnesses.

Earlier this month, a CPS barrister sparked public outrage by referring to a 13 year-old girl as “predatory” and “sexually experienced” during the sentencing of her 41 year-old abuser. A recent child prostitution case where a witness was cross-examined by seven barristers over 12 days has also caused alarm.

Lord Judge rejected the call for specialist courts to be used where children are required to give evidence, as this would lead to longer waiting times and would be expensive to set up and run. 

Baroness Deech, chair of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), welcomed the announcement, adding that the new Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates, being introduced next month, would assess advocate’s ability to deal with vulnerable witnesses.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll