header-logo header-logo

Provisional assessment: worth the risk?

29 November 2024 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8096 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
199156
Use of these assessments is on the wane, but a good understanding is as important to practitioners as ever, writes David Bailey-Vella
  • Provisional assessment is a streamlined process, used to resolve costs disputes in cases where a full detailed assessment is not deemed necessary, up to a value of £75,000.
  • The recent case of Christodoulides v Holbech highlights the importance for both practitioners and litigants in person of having a working knowledge of the rules on assessments, and how and when to challenge an outcome.

As a practitioner, I have noticed a decrease in the number of provisional assessments over the past 12 months. While this could be due to a number of reasons, one assumes this might, in part, be due to the extension to fixed recoverable costs. However, having knowledge of the nature of these assessments and their corresponding rules is as important today as it was at the introduction of CPR 47.15, implemented to reduce the burden of the court from detailed assessment hearings.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll