header-logo header-logo

Provisional assessment: worth the risk?

29 November 2024 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8096 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
199156
Use of these assessments is on the wane, but a good understanding is as important to practitioners as ever, writes David Bailey-Vella
  • Provisional assessment is a streamlined process, used to resolve costs disputes in cases where a full detailed assessment is not deemed necessary, up to a value of £75,000.
  • The recent case of Christodoulides v Holbech highlights the importance for both practitioners and litigants in person of having a working knowledge of the rules on assessments, and how and when to challenge an outcome.

As a practitioner, I have noticed a decrease in the number of provisional assessments over the past 12 months. While this could be due to a number of reasons, one assumes this might, in part, be due to the extension to fixed recoverable costs. However, having knowledge of the nature of these assessments and their corresponding rules is as important today as it was at the introduction of CPR 47.15, implemented to reduce the burden of the court from detailed assessment hearings.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll