header-logo header-logo

29 November 2024 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8096 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Provisional assessment: worth the risk?

199156
Use of these assessments is on the wane, but a good understanding is as important to practitioners as ever, writes David Bailey-Vella
  • Provisional assessment is a streamlined process, used to resolve costs disputes in cases where a full detailed assessment is not deemed necessary, up to a value of £75,000.
  • The recent case of Christodoulides v Holbech highlights the importance for both practitioners and litigants in person of having a working knowledge of the rules on assessments, and how and when to challenge an outcome.

As a practitioner, I have noticed a decrease in the number of provisional assessments over the past 12 months. While this could be due to a number of reasons, one assumes this might, in part, be due to the extension to fixed recoverable costs. However, having knowledge of the nature of these assessments and their corresponding rules is as important today as it was at the introduction of CPR 47.15, implemented to reduce the burden of the court from detailed assessment hearings.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll