header-logo header-logo

19 August 2016
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Public Interest Lawyers threatened with closure

Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), whose legal aid contracts were pulled by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) on 2 August, is likely to close its offices at the end of the month.

LAA terminated the contract after a “thorough review of information provided by PIL” in relation to claims against the Ministry of Defence on behalf of Iraqi nationals. This followed an investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) into the firm.

In a statement the LAA said it was clear that “contractual breaches” with LAA’s contract were proven and warranted investigation by the relevant authorities. The SRA has asked the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) to consider allegations against the firm.

Steve Hynes, director of Legal Action Group (LAG) says: “We would have preferred the SDT hearing to be held in public as justice should be seen to be done, but appreciate that there might be good reasons, such as client confidentiality, for it not to be.”

Hynes adds that the void left by the lack of hard facts in this matter has been filled with speculation and “a good few of assumptions being jumped to by some sections of the media”.

“The journalists and others rushing to condemn Phil Shiner and his firm, would be best advised to remain silent and let the disciplinary hearing run its course,” he says.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll