header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Blogs , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Book review: Public Law after the Human Rights Act

Published 10 years after the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) came into force, Tom Hickman’s recent book is an impressive critique of the complex relationship between public law and the HRA.

BOOK REVIEW

Public Law after the Human Rights Act
Author: Tom Hickman
Publisher: Hart Publishing (May 2010)
ISBN: 978-1841139692 Price: £45.00

The complexity of that relationship is particularly evident from the book’s contrasting emphasis on the centrality of the Act to the legal system as a whole, and on the fraught relationship resulting from its position within the context of the well established principles of public law.

Key questions

Throughout the book, Hickman grapples with a number of key questions, such as the function of public law, the status and nature of the HRA, and the HRA’s relationship with common law. In doing so, he provides a well-measured assessment of different arguments, heavily drawn from relevant case-law and academia. Having analysed these differing views, he presents convincing, albeit far from universally accepted, conclusions. The author reaches a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll