header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Blogs , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Book review: Public Law after the Human Rights Act

Published 10 years after the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) came into force, Tom Hickman’s recent book is an impressive critique of the complex relationship between public law and the HRA.

BOOK REVIEW

Public Law after the Human Rights Act
Author: Tom Hickman
Publisher: Hart Publishing (May 2010)
ISBN: 978-1841139692 Price: £45.00

The complexity of that relationship is particularly evident from the book’s contrasting emphasis on the centrality of the Act to the legal system as a whole, and on the fraught relationship resulting from its position within the context of the well established principles of public law.

Key questions

Throughout the book, Hickman grapples with a number of key questions, such as the function of public law, the status and nature of the HRA, and the HRA’s relationship with common law. In doing so, he provides a well-measured assessment of different arguments, heavily drawn from relevant case-law and academia. Having analysed these differing views, he presents convincing, albeit far from universally accepted, conclusions. The author reaches a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll