header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Alasdair Mackenzie
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Public law update

HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMMIGRATION

In Huang (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); Kashmiri (Appellant) v SSHD (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 11, [2007] All ER (D) 338 (Mar) Mei Ling Huang was a Chinese national, who had spent much of the last 14 years in the UK, where most of her family lived. Ali Kashmiri was an Iranian whose immediate family had been granted asylum in the UK. Neither was of an age where any immigration rules regarding dependent relatives applied, and, when refused leave to enter or remain in the UK, each appealed in reliance on Art 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Huang’s appeal was allowed by an adjudicator, but the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) appealed successfully to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. Kashmiri’s appeal was dismissed by an adjudicator and he appealed unsuccessfully to the tribunal.

Proportionality

The two appeals (plus a third, not pursued before the House) had come before the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll