header-logo header-logo

Public law update

14 June 2007 / Alasdair Mackenzie
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMMIGRATION

In Huang (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); Kashmiri (Appellant) v SSHD (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 11, [2007] All ER (D) 338 (Mar) Mei Ling Huang was a Chinese national, who had spent much of the last 14 years in the UK, where most of her family lived. Ali Kashmiri was an Iranian whose immediate family had been granted asylum in the UK. Neither was of an age where any immigration rules regarding dependent relatives applied, and, when refused leave to enter or remain in the UK, each appealed in reliance on Art 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Huang’s appeal was allowed by an adjudicator, but the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) appealed successfully to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. Kashmiri’s appeal was dismissed by an adjudicator and he appealed unsuccessfully to the tribunal.

Proportionality

The two appeals (plus a third, not pursued before the House) had come before the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll