header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Alasdair Mackenzie
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Public law update

HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMMIGRATION

In Huang (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); Kashmiri (Appellant) v SSHD (Respondent) [2007] UKHL 11, [2007] All ER (D) 338 (Mar) Mei Ling Huang was a Chinese national, who had spent much of the last 14 years in the UK, where most of her family lived. Ali Kashmiri was an Iranian whose immediate family had been granted asylum in the UK. Neither was of an age where any immigration rules regarding dependent relatives applied, and, when refused leave to enter or remain in the UK, each appealed in reliance on Art 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Huang’s appeal was allowed by an adjudicator, but the Secretary of State for the Home Department (SSHD) appealed successfully to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal. Kashmiri’s appeal was dismissed by an adjudicator and he appealed unsuccessfully to the tribunal.

Proportionality

The two appeals (plus a third, not pursued before the House) had come before the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll