header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / Ulele Burnham , Jamie Burton
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Public , Profession , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Public Law Update

Two-tiered duty to promote race equality, Race Relations Act 1976, S71, Legal necessity for proper consultation

RACE EQUALITY

The celebrated Macpherson report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence, The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, was a significant event in the development of legal rules designed to take account of systemic racial discrimination. One of the legislative responses to Sir William Macpherson’s well-publicised coinage of the term ‘institutional racism’ was the two-tiered duty placed on public authorities to promote race equality.

Statutory duties

The general duty, found in the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976), s 71(1), is an obligation for all specified public bodies to have due regard to the need to “eliminate unlawful racial discrimination…and to promote equality of opportunity and good relations between persons of different racial groups”.

The specific duty, placed upon a further category of public authorities specified by the secretary of state, requires such bodies to make procedural arrangements, eg the publication of a race equality scheme detailing the arrangements for assessing and monitoring the likely impact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll