header-logo header-logo

Public now view litigation as a means to drive ethical behaviour

28 November 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail
Attitudes to class actions are shifting among the general public and business leaders, research shows.

A report published by Portland this week, based on a poll of 2,000 people and 540 UK business leaders, found a growing majority of the public have a positive view of class actions as a way to win compensation, improve corporate behaviour and hold companies accountable for their actions. Some 65% of respondents would sign up to a class action and 57% believe class actions ‘often’ win compensation for claimants (up from 44% who held this view in 2023). Half of the respondents agreed class actions drive improvements in corporate behaviour.

However, the report, ‘Reputation and accountability: class actions, ESG and values-driven litigation’, also detected low public awareness of people’s eligibility to claim compensation in high-profile actions. Only 22% of the public knew they could claim compensation in Competition Appeal Tribunal claims, despite several high-stakes cases in recent years.

Among business leaders polled, more than three-quarters (77%) agreed directors have a duty to mitigate their company’s climate risks and two-thirds supported legal action to hold governments to account for climate breaches. Some 72% supported the use of litigation against companies accused of human rights in their supply chains, and more than two-thirds believe the increase in group litigation will improve corporate behaviour.

Simon Pugh, head of Portland’s litigation and disputes practice, said: ‘The data shows some really big shifts.

‘For the first time ever, our data provides real insight into how litigation with a moral and ethical purpose is being perceived by business leaders. Businesses need to adapt to these legal risks posed by a rapidly evolving legal environment; especially as new regulation takes hold.

‘But they must also be alive to the mood of the public on these issues. Companies who find themselves involved in litigation will find the risk to their reputation presents more challenges than just uncomfortable headlines.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll