header-logo header-logo

28 November 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Public now view litigation as a means to drive ethical behaviour

Attitudes to class actions are shifting among the general public and business leaders, research shows.

A report published by Portland this week, based on a poll of 2,000 people and 540 UK business leaders, found a growing majority of the public have a positive view of class actions as a way to win compensation, improve corporate behaviour and hold companies accountable for their actions. Some 65% of respondents would sign up to a class action and 57% believe class actions ‘often’ win compensation for claimants (up from 44% who held this view in 2023). Half of the respondents agreed class actions drive improvements in corporate behaviour.

However, the report, ‘Reputation and accountability: class actions, ESG and values-driven litigation’, also detected low public awareness of people’s eligibility to claim compensation in high-profile actions. Only 22% of the public knew they could claim compensation in Competition Appeal Tribunal claims, despite several high-stakes cases in recent years.

Among business leaders polled, more than three-quarters (77%) agreed directors have a duty to mitigate their company’s climate risks and two-thirds supported legal action to hold governments to account for climate breaches. Some 72% supported the use of litigation against companies accused of human rights in their supply chains, and more than two-thirds believe the increase in group litigation will improve corporate behaviour.

Simon Pugh, head of Portland’s litigation and disputes practice, said: ‘The data shows some really big shifts.

‘For the first time ever, our data provides real insight into how litigation with a moral and ethical purpose is being perceived by business leaders. Businesses need to adapt to these legal risks posed by a rapidly evolving legal environment; especially as new regulation takes hold.

‘But they must also be alive to the mood of the public on these issues. Companies who find themselves involved in litigation will find the risk to their reputation presents more challenges than just uncomfortable headlines.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , ESG , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll