header-logo header-logo

24 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Publication times reduced for Bar misconduct

Barristers who break professional rules will have their misdeeds publicly available for less time, under new rules.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) last week decided to reduce the length of publication time for misconduct findings, effective from 15 September 2019.

Findings that do not result in suspension or disbarment will be available for two years, as currently happens. Where suspension is for 12 months or less the finding will be available for five years plus the suspension period—half the current period of ten years.

If suspension is for longer than 12 months, the period will be ten years plus the suspension period. Currently, publication would be indefinite for both situations.

BSB director of professional conduct, Sara Jagger said: ‘It is essential that we put the needs of the public first, but we also need to ensure that we take into account t

Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll