header-logo header-logo

Pupils report back

24 March 2021
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
The number of pupillages on offer decreased by 35% from 592 in 2019 to 386 in 2020, according to Bar Council research

Half of the pupil respondents had spoken with their supervisor at least once a day, and a further 27% two to three times per week. Some 11% felt unhappy with their supervision.

The main challenges cited were lack of networking, interruption to court work, and lack of contact with supervisors. Nearly one quarter of all pupils are experiencing financial hardship.

Bar chair Derek Sweeting QC said the high satisfaction rates were ‘testament to the dedication of chambers and pupil supervisors’.

Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll