header-logo header-logo

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Tax , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Pushback on tax adviser plans for conveyancers

Conveyancers have objected to Treasury plans to make them register as tax advisers, currently set out in the Finance Bill 2025-26

In a letter to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week, Dame Janet Paraskeva, chair of the Council for Licensed Conveyancers, wrote: ‘This step will duplicate regulatory effort and will increase the regulatory burden in an area where there is no significant issue in relation to compliance with tax law.’

Moreover, Paraskeva noted, registration as tax advisers ‘would have the perverse effect of creating the impression’ that conveyancers offer tax advice to their clients—something they are not permitted to do under their professional regulations.

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Tax , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll