header-logo header-logo

14 June 2012 / Simon Gibbs
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Put pen to paper

The absence of a written retainer can cause costs chaos, says Simon Gibbs

 

A useful reminder of the importance of understanding the basics of costs law comes  in the form of the decision of Mrs Justice Lang in Fladgate LLP v Harrison [2012] EWHC 67 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 45 (Feb).
 
The defendant had instructed the claimant firm of solicitors to undertake certain work. The claimant sent the defendant a draft engagement letter setting out the terms of the instructions and asking the defendant to inform them if the letter was incorrect in any way. No response was made. A final version of the engagement letter was subsequently sent to the defendant, together with the firms’ terms of business and the defendant was invited to complete and sign the letter. No response was received to the letter and the claimant continued to act for the defendant. Various interim invoices were sent to the defendant. 

No written contract

In
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll