header-logo header-logo

Put pen to paper

14 June 2012 / Simon Gibbs
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The absence of a written retainer can cause costs chaos, says Simon Gibbs

 

A useful reminder of the importance of understanding the basics of costs law comes  in the form of the decision of Mrs Justice Lang in Fladgate LLP v Harrison [2012] EWHC 67 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 45 (Feb).
 
The defendant had instructed the claimant firm of solicitors to undertake certain work. The claimant sent the defendant a draft engagement letter setting out the terms of the instructions and asking the defendant to inform them if the letter was incorrect in any way. No response was made. A final version of the engagement letter was subsequently sent to the defendant, together with the firms’ terms of business and the defendant was invited to complete and sign the letter. No response was received to the letter and the claimant continued to act for the defendant. Various interim invoices were sent to the defendant. 

No written contract

In due course, the defendant
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll