header-logo header-logo

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

QOCS for defamation & privacy

New proposals for qualified one-way costs shifting

The Ministry of Justice has proposed introducing costs protection for defamation and invasion of privacy claimants.

Its consultation, Costs Protection in Defamation and Privacy Claims, published last week, is a response to concerns raised by the Leveson Report that people of modest means are put off suing members of the media because of the risk they could end up having to pay enormous costs.

Under the proposals, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) will enable judges to impose a one-way costs order where it is clear one side would not otherwise be able to take part. A costs order could also be imposed to help a small media outlet contest a case brought by a wealthy individual.

The changes are intended to come into effect from April 2014, alongside reforms to “no win no fee” defamation and privacy cases.

QOCS was introduced for personal injury cases in April.

The consultation closes on 8 November 2013.

Justice Minister, Helen Grant says: “Defamation and invasion of privacy can have a devastating effect on lives and it is crucial that people, whatever their means, can stand up for their rights in court even when they are facing a wealthy opponent who can afford to appoint a team of expensive lawyers.”

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll