header-logo header-logo

QOCS for defamation & privacy

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New proposals for qualified one-way costs shifting

The Ministry of Justice has proposed introducing costs protection for defamation and invasion of privacy claimants.

Its consultation, Costs Protection in Defamation and Privacy Claims, published last week, is a response to concerns raised by the Leveson Report that people of modest means are put off suing members of the media because of the risk they could end up having to pay enormous costs.

Under the proposals, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) will enable judges to impose a one-way costs order where it is clear one side would not otherwise be able to take part. A costs order could also be imposed to help a small media outlet contest a case brought by a wealthy individual.

The changes are intended to come into effect from April 2014, alongside reforms to “no win no fee” defamation and privacy cases.

QOCS was introduced for personal injury cases in April.

The consultation closes on 8 November 2013.

Justice Minister, Helen Grant says: “Defamation and invasion of privacy can have a devastating effect on lives and it is crucial that people, whatever their means, can stand up for their rights in court even when they are facing a wealthy opponent who can afford to appoint a team of expensive lawyers.”

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll