header-logo header-logo

QOCS for defamation & privacy

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New proposals for qualified one-way costs shifting

The Ministry of Justice has proposed introducing costs protection for defamation and invasion of privacy claimants.

Its consultation, Costs Protection in Defamation and Privacy Claims, published last week, is a response to concerns raised by the Leveson Report that people of modest means are put off suing members of the media because of the risk they could end up having to pay enormous costs.

Under the proposals, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) will enable judges to impose a one-way costs order where it is clear one side would not otherwise be able to take part. A costs order could also be imposed to help a small media outlet contest a case brought by a wealthy individual.

The changes are intended to come into effect from April 2014, alongside reforms to “no win no fee” defamation and privacy cases.

QOCS was introduced for personal injury cases in April.

The consultation closes on 8 November 2013.

Justice Minister, Helen Grant says: “Defamation and invasion of privacy can have a devastating effect on lives and it is crucial that people, whatever their means, can stand up for their rights in court even when they are facing a wealthy opponent who can afford to appoint a team of expensive lawyers.”

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll