header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Qualified approval

Trevor Tayleur explains the workings of the new, streamlined, Qualifications Directive

The battle against protectionism has been waged on many fronts. As part of its armoury, the European Community has adopted myriad directives to prevent member states from insisting that  citizens qualified in other member states also obtain the domestic qualification in order to practise their profession or trade.

The alleged inadequacy of qualifications obtained in other member states cannot be used as a pretext for protecting local professionals and tradespeople. Directive 2005/36 (“the Qualifications Directive”) is the most recent addition to the Community’s armoury.

The Qualifications Directive has strengthened the position of  citizens qualified in one member state wanting to practise in another member state in two ways. First, it allows service-providers to render services on a temporary and occasional basis under their original professional title without having to apply for host State recognition of their qualifications.

They may have to comply with some procedural formalities and there are limited public health and safety derogations; nevertheless their position has been significantly enhanced. Second,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll