header-logo header-logo

Qualified approval

25 October 2007 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Trevor Tayleur explains the workings of the new, streamlined, Qualifications Directive

The battle against protectionism has been waged on many fronts. As part of its armoury, the European Community has adopted myriad directives to prevent member states from insisting that  citizens qualified in other member states also obtain the domestic qualification in order to practise their profession or trade.

The alleged inadequacy of qualifications obtained in other member states cannot be used as a pretext for protecting local professionals and tradespeople. Directive 2005/36 (“the Qualifications Directive”) is the most recent addition to the Community’s armoury.

The Qualifications Directive has strengthened the position of  citizens qualified in one member state wanting to practise in another member state in two ways. First, it allows service-providers to render services on a temporary and occasional basis under their original professional title without having to apply for host State recognition of their qualifications.

They may have to comply with some procedural formalities and there are limited public health and safety derogations; nevertheless their position has been significantly enhanced. Second,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll