header-logo header-logo

The quality of mercy

18 January 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns questions the ethical foundations
for the prohibition on assisted suicide

David March was convicted of assisting his wife’s suicide; his case, in the crown court, 19 October 2006, unreported, highlights yet again how inappropriate the blunt tool of the criminal law can be in prosecuting individuals who, by tragic misfortune, find themselves placed in the invidious position of having to take criminal action to relieve the suffering of a loved one.

Gillian March was diagnosed with the progressive degenerative disease multiple sclerosis in 1984. She attempted suicide in June 2004 and in June 2005. Mrs March recorded in her diary her desire to end her life many years before. In 1992, she wrote: “It is the only way I can cope, having an escape route if things get too bad.”

Mr March, her husband, left his job to look after his wife, after she became confined to a wheelchair, which he did with enormous love and care over many years. Indeed, Judge Brian Barker, at the Old Bailey trial, said to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll