header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / David Cartwright
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A quantum leap?

Settling damages for latex allergies may involve a trip to court in future, says David Cartwright

Foxton v Wakefield West Primary Care NHS Trust is the first case where damages for a latex allergy were assessed at trial. Mrs Foxton was was aged 45½ at the date of a two-day assessment of damages hearing. She was employed by Wakefield West Primary Care NHS Trust as a community staff nurse from March 2003.

In 2004 she developed a latex allergy as a result of admitted negligence of the defendant. The allergy forced Mrs Foxton to give up her career as a community nurse, she also suffered a degree of psychological injury and contended that she would never be able to work again. However, the defendant contended that she could have returned to work by April 2006 and on that issue alone the main difference between the parties concerning quantum was that of loss of earnings.

Latex allergy is permanent. From 2004 Mrs Foxton suffered a number of upsetting reactions caused by her proximity to latex,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll