header-logo header-logo

17 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Queen’s Counsel of 2020

Appropriately socially distanced celebrations broke out in home offices around England and Wales as the results of the 2020 silk round were announced
A lucky 116 lawyers made it through the rigorous application process to be named Queen’s Counsel. They include 40 women out of 72 who applied (compared to 30 out of 52 last year), 28 applicants aged over 50 (compared to 26 last year) and six solicitor-advocates out of 15 who applied (compared to four last year).

Some 14 applicants who declared an ethnic origin other than white were successful, out of 30 who applied (compared to 22 out of 42 last year). The youngest QC-to-be is 35 years old, and the most senior is 58.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council said: ‘Huge congratulations to all the newly appointed QCs!

‘This badge of honour is a source of pride, recognised globally as a mark of the exceptionally high-quality advocacy of the Bar of England and Wales. Because of coronavirus, the traditional QC appointment ceremony will not take place in March but, we are delighted that, after we raised this issue with the Lord Chancellor, he has confirmed that new QCs will be able to use their title in the normal timeframe.’

Sir Alex Allan, Chair of the Selection Panel, said: ‘I congratulate each one of them.

‘The selection process is a rigorous and demanding one. We collect confidential assessments from judges, fellow advocates and professional clients, who give freely of their time to provide evidence about an applicant’s demonstration of the competencies. Those applicants who are not filtered out following consideration of the assessments are then interviewed by two members of the Selection Panel, following which the whole Panel discuss all the evidence on each interviewed applicant.

‘We were particularly pleased that for the first year ever, the number of women appointed―40, which amounts to 34% of the total appointed, is almost equal to the proportion of women in the relevant segment of the profession.

‘The number of BAME (black, Asian or minority ethnic) applicants appointed, although lower than last year’s record total of 22, is also almost equal to the proportion of BAME advocates in the relevant segment of the profession.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll