header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Questions raised over tendering plans

Legal Services

A consultation on the principles of best value tendering (BVT) for criminal defence services, and a policy paper—Assuring and Improving Quality in the Reformed Legal Aid System—have been published by the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

The paper considers three options for the provision of criminal legal aid services: to continue to set prices administratively; switch to a national public defender system; or move to BVT—the option the LSC favours. Tendering would take place from January 2009 in Avon and Greater Manchester, followed by a further three phases from January 2010 to  January 2011, the latter two of which would include crown court work.

Contracting in the first phase would cover police station and magistrates’ court work. The two would be linked, possibly by having a single fee for any case of either type, or by asking firms to bid against a matrix. The LSC proposes to consult on a single fee for crown court cases this year.

Carolyn Regan, LSC chief executive, says that moving to a competitive market for the majority of services is the right way forward.

“BVT would set sustainable prices and achieve the best possible value for the legal aid budget while ensuring quality advice for legal aid clients. This will benefit clients, reassure taxpayers and ensure that the market sets the price for providers’ services,” she says.

However, Law Society president Andrew Holroyd says several questions about how BVT could operate in the legal aid world remain unanswered in this consultation.

“The LSC must tell us, for example: how firms can tender when volume cannot be guaranteed; how solicitors can tender for multiple contracts to businesses that will be competing against each other; how the LSC will ensure that BME [black and minority ethnic] firms are treated equally and in a non-discriminatory manner; and, fundamentally, how firms can offer a rational bid when the government keeps changing the criminal justice system,” he says. “If the LSC cannot answer these questions but presses on with BVT, the society is concerned that the firms they need to provide the service will be driven out of legal aid and it will be impossible to rebuild the supplier base,” he adds.

The BVT consultation runs until 3 March 2008.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll