header-logo header-logo

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—David Ereira

18 January 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Restructuring heavyweight joins the firm’s London office

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK has announced that restructuring expert David Ereira is joining the firm as a partner. David was previously at Paul Hastings, where he was a partner specialising in restructuring and insolvency.

David has led the representation of debtors, creditors, investors and governments in some of the largest and most complex restructurings of the past few years, including advising the administrators of Lehman Brothers in the largest bankruptcy in history.

He has previously worked alongside Quinn Emanuel on disputes arising out of the NMC administration. David was chairman of the Insolvency Service and was awarded the OBE for services to insolvency and charity. Prior to joining Paul Hastings in 2015, he was a partner at Magic Circle firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters.

David said: ‘The restructuring markets in England and globally are at an inflection point. The combination of economic pressure, high interest rates and political uncertainty have made this a challenging time for businesses and investors. Clients will require new and creative approaches from their lawyers, combining restructuring with contentious expertise. I am very excited to have the opportunity to work with Richard East and the Quinn Emanuel team to help meet this challenge for their clients.’

Quinn Emanuel now has 30 partners and 85 associates/of counsel in London.

Richard East, the firm’s London senior partner, said: ‘David has unrivalled expertise in the restructuring and insolvency market and will be a great fit with our contentious restructuring practice. We can’t wait for him to get started.’

John B Quinn, Quinn Emanuel’s founder and chairman, said: ‘David is an outstanding lawyer with decades of experience working on the biggest, most complex restructurings. We believe he will have a considerable impact on our London office, which is in major growth mode.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll