header-logo header-logo

08 February 2023
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-detail

Radical cryptoassets claim given go-ahead

A case seeking to prove software developers owe a fiduciary duty to the owners of digital assets should go to trial, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lawyers say the claim, if successful, would be ground-breaking, setting a precedent that any software developers who have ever written and contributed open-source code (code that can be used by anyone) owe duties to all the users of that code. The duty would be applicable to any digital asset, including cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens.

Consequently, software developers could face billion-dollar claims from owners of cryptoassets with whom they have had no previous contact—a major deterrent to open-source coding.

Ruling in Tulip Trading (a Seychelles company) v Bitcoin Association & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 83 last week, the court found there was a ‘serious issue to be tried’—the prerequisite for serving proceedings on persons outside the jurisdiction of the English courts.

Tulip Trading is owned by computer scientist Dr Craig Wright, who claims to be the creator of bitcoin and the identity behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, issued a multi-billion dollar claim against 16 cryptocurrency developers, alleging private keys were hacked and removed from Wright’s computer, meaning Tulip was unable to access crypto-assets worth £3bn. Tulip claims the developers of the relevant software owe the company a fiduciary duty and duty of care to assist Tulip to regain access and control of the assets via a software patch.

The defendants are open-source developers who voluntarily write and post code to GitHub, an open-source forum, and are not based in England.

James Ramsden KC, acting for the defendants, said: ‘The courts in this jurisdiction continue to lead the common law world in developing a legal structure for the de-fi sector [decentralised finance].

‘This case will be the most important so far in maintaining that lead and continuing to establish this jurisdiction as the leader for de-fi litigation. The outcome of this claim at trial will therefore have a profound impact and not just in the UK.

‘That impact will apply regardless of whatever regulation the UK government eventually settles on. So watch this space.’

Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll