header-logo header-logo

Radical cryptoassets claim given go-ahead

08 February 2023
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-detail
A case seeking to prove software developers owe a fiduciary duty to the owners of digital assets should go to trial, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lawyers say the claim, if successful, would be ground-breaking, setting a precedent that any software developers who have ever written and contributed open-source code (code that can be used by anyone) owe duties to all the users of that code. The duty would be applicable to any digital asset, including cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens.

Consequently, software developers could face billion-dollar claims from owners of cryptoassets with whom they have had no previous contact—a major deterrent to open-source coding.

Ruling in Tulip Trading (a Seychelles company) v Bitcoin Association & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 83 last week, the court found there was a ‘serious issue to be tried’—the prerequisite for serving proceedings on persons outside the jurisdiction of the English courts.

Tulip Trading is owned by computer scientist Dr Craig Wright, who claims to be the creator of bitcoin and the identity behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, issued a multi-billion dollar claim against 16 cryptocurrency developers, alleging private keys were hacked and removed from Wright’s computer, meaning Tulip was unable to access crypto-assets worth £3bn. Tulip claims the developers of the relevant software owe the company a fiduciary duty and duty of care to assist Tulip to regain access and control of the assets via a software patch.

The defendants are open-source developers who voluntarily write and post code to GitHub, an open-source forum, and are not based in England.

James Ramsden KC, acting for the defendants, said: ‘The courts in this jurisdiction continue to lead the common law world in developing a legal structure for the de-fi sector [decentralised finance].

‘This case will be the most important so far in maintaining that lead and continuing to establish this jurisdiction as the leader for de-fi litigation. The outcome of this claim at trial will therefore have a profound impact and not just in the UK.

‘That impact will apply regardless of whatever regulation the UK government eventually settles on. So watch this space.’

Issue: 8012 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Housing management team expands with specialist partner hire

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Brand protection and IP disputes expertise strengthened with partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar 2025 and joint head of chambers at 4PB, sets out in this week's NLJ how the profession will respond to Baroness Harriet Harman KC’s review into bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct at the Bar
back-to-top-scroll