header-logo header-logo

Rate change for serious injury

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Insurance / reinsurance , Damages
printer mail-detail
The Scottish government has set the personal injury discount rate, the rate used to determine lump sum compensation for pursuers who suffer a serious injury.

In England and Wales, the discount rate changed from –0.75% to –0.25% in August, prompting insurance lawyers to express concern about the cost to public bodies.

Julian Chamberlayne, chairman of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS) said: ‘The government actuary, Martin Clarke, has set the new discount rate in Scotland and guess what? It is staying at –0.75%.

‘In doing so Mr Clarke—adopting the new approach required by the Damages (Investment Returns and Periodical Payments) (Scotland) Act 2019—has made a 0.5% adjustment to reduce the proportion of seriously injured claimants who will be undercompensated. Conceptually this is the same type of adjustment recommended by the Government Actuary's Department which was adopted by the Lord Chancellor in the summer when setting the rate in England and Wales.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll