header-logo header-logo

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Insurance / reinsurance , Damages
printer mail-detail

Rate change for serious injury

The Scottish government has set the personal injury discount rate, the rate used to determine lump sum compensation for pursuers who suffer a serious injury.

In England and Wales, the discount rate changed from –0.75% to –0.25% in August, prompting insurance lawyers to express concern about the cost to public bodies.

Julian Chamberlayne, chairman of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS) said: ‘The government actuary, Martin Clarke, has set the new discount rate in Scotland and guess what? It is staying at –0.75%.

‘In doing so Mr Clarke—adopting the new approach required by the Damages (Investment Returns and Periodical Payments) (Scotland) Act 2019—has made a 0.5% adjustment to reduce the proportion of seriously injured claimants who will be undercompensated. Conceptually this is the same type of adjustment recommended by the Government Actuary's Department which was adopted by the Lord Chancellor in the summer when setting the rate in England and Wales.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll