header-logo header-logo

02 October 2019
Issue: 7858 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Insurance / reinsurance , Damages
printer mail-detail

Rate change for serious injury

The Scottish government has set the personal injury discount rate, the rate used to determine lump sum compensation for pursuers who suffer a serious injury.

In England and Wales, the discount rate changed from –0.75% to –0.25% in August, prompting insurance lawyers to express concern about the cost to public bodies.

Julian Chamberlayne, chairman of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS) said: ‘The government actuary, Martin Clarke, has set the new discount rate in Scotland and guess what? It is staying at –0.75%.

‘In doing so Mr Clarke—adopting the new approach required by the Damages (Investment Returns and Periodical Payments) (Scotland) Act 2019—has made a 0.5% adjustment to reduce the proportion of seriously injured claimants who will be undercompensated. Conceptually this is the same type of adjustment recommended by the Government Actuary's Department which was adopted by the Lord Chancellor in the summer when setting the rate in England and Wales.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll