header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 July 2007 / Adrian Turner
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Re-balancing justice

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

How has the criminal justice system changed under Labour? Adrian Turner investigates

The Conservative party has long been proud to call itself the party of law and order, but the Margaret Thatcher years saw little significant development in criminal justice policy until the enactment of the surprisingly liberal—if not socialist in relation to unit fines—Criminal Justice Act 1991. It was not until Michael Howard became home secretary that the mantle was picked up with any real “right wing” intent, and it proved popular. This would not have escaped the notice of the New Labour image makers, but with the leading personnel that the party had we would probably have seen a “tougher” Labour government in any event. It was thanks to the opposition that the last Conservative administration was able to get the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997—mandatory sentences and all—onto the statute books before the general election.

INITIAL LABOUR REFORMS

Following its electoral triumph, the new government set about the reform of criminal justice as it had promised. Some of this—such as the procedural

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll