header-logo header-logo

25 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

Recession boosts flexible working uptake in law firms

Internal secondments popular as recession-proofing measure

Flexible working, sabbaticals and part-time working are on the rise as top 100 firms strive to avoid redundancies.

Research by Sweet & Maxwell among 25 of the top 100 commercial law firms shows 44% encouraging employees to take sabbaticals and one in four firms offering part-time working.

A third of firms say they have considered introducing pay cuts, although only one firm has gone ahead and done this.
Nearly one quarter have frozen salaries, while 60% are still considering this option.

Offering lawyers temporary internal secondments was the most popular recession-proofing measure, with more than half of firms moving lawyers from departments that have lost work into busier departments. However, this is not always possible as clients expect highly specialised knowledge and experience from lawyers.

Sabbaticals are the second most popular option, and the third most common measure is to retrain lawyers—42% of firms have adopted this, and 28% are considering it.

Several City law firms, including DLA Piper and Norton Rose, have offered trainees £5,000 and up to £10,000 respectively to defer their starting date and take a paid gap year (subject to certain conditions) until the economic situation improves.

One in five HR directors who took part in the survey said they planned to reduce headcount, nearly a quarter plan to increase headcount, and the majority (56%) plan to keep it the same.
Norton Rose introduced a flexible working scheme in its London office in March, and received approval this month to roll the scheme out across its offices in France and Germany. Its other international offices signed up in May.

Staff can choose to work a four-day week at 85% of base salary, or take a sabbatical of between four and 12 weeks at 30% of base salary.
Spokesman Sean Twomey said the scheme was introduced “partly in response to the recession and partly as an alternative within the firm”.

Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll