header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A recipe for confusion?

Greville Healey and Philip Sissons consider the future for proprietary estoppel in commercial cases

The higher courts have had to grapple with the boundaries of the doctrines of proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts on a number of occasions in recent years. In particular, there have been important cases on the role these principles play in the case of joint ownership of property, generally in a family context, for example the recent House of Lords' decision in Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929. The flexible potential of both proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts to provide a route to redress in cases of informal or otherwise inchoate agreements is well known. However, the possibility of establishing such a claim in the commercial context must now be considered in the light of the principles set out in the important decision of Yeoman's Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55.

The facts of that case were as follows:
      ●     The respondent, Mr Cobbe, entered into an agreement with the appellant company with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll