header-logo header-logo

28 June 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Recovering ill-gotten gains

More money could be returned to victims of crime, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Max Hill QC has told Peers

Giving evidence to the House of Lords Fraud Act 2006 and Digital Fraud Select Committee last week, Hill recommended the government consider court powers to reimburse victims with any additional funds that are recovered. 

Currently, a Confiscation Order identifies the amount a criminal financially benefited from their crime and orders repayment. If the criminal is later found to have additional money and assets, the Confiscation Order can be increased.

However, there is no equivalent power to increase Compensation Orders, which give money back to victims. Therefore, additional funds recovered cannot be given to the victims of the crime.

Hill said: ‘It is right that as much money as possible should be returned to victims of crime but I am concerned current legislation means in some cases we do not have the power to do this.’

Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll