header-logo header-logo

"Red tape" harassment repeal

03 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 is abolished

Employers’ section 40 requirement to safeguard employees against harassment from clients and customers has been abolished.

Under s 40 of the Equality Act 2010, an employer was liable for harassment of its employees by third parties, such as customers on the shop floor, over whom the employer had no direct control. The liability was triggered where the harassment took place in the course of the employee’s work, the employee had been harassed at least twice before, and the employer knew about it and had not taken reasonable steps to prevent a recurrence.

Section 40 was repealed on 1 October. 

Tom Walker, employment law partner at Manches, says: “The repeal is probably a realistic, practical move in that the vast majority of employees will continue to be protected from harassment by the Equality Act, if they have a protected characteristic. However, it’s always a shame to see some well-principled, perhaps idealistic, piece of legislation being curtailed.”

Walker said the probable reasons for the repeal were that the provisions went further than the relevant Directive required, and it fitted the political climate of cutting “red tape”

 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll