header-logo header-logo

Redraft ‘confusing’ immigration rules

15 January 2020
Issue: 7870 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
Home Office officials should take a ‘less prescriptive approach to evidence’ and redraft the Immigration Rules to save money, speed up decision-making and build trust, according to the Law Commission

While not making any recommendations on substantive immigration policy, the Law Commission report on the Simplification of the Immigration Rules, published this week, suggests improvements to the way the rules are written and presented could save the government as much as £70m over the next decade. It recommends ‘a complete redrafting’ to make the rules easier for applicants to understand, as well as introducing a twice-yearly limit to updates, in April and October.

It also recommends the Home Office reduce the level of detail and prescription required, as this has led to increasing numbers of amendments and changes, making the rules more complicated.

The Commissioners say these changes would save the Home Office money by reducing mistakes and, consequently, administrative reviews, appeals and judicial reviews.

Nicholas Paines QC, Public Law Commissioner, said: ‘For both applicants and case workers, the drafting of the Immigration Rules and frequent updates makes them too difficult to follow.

‘This has resulted in mistakes that waste time and cost taxpayer money. By improving the drafting, restructuring the layout and removing inconsistencies, our recommendations will make a real difference by saving money and increasing public confidence in the rules.’

In the past decade, the rules have nearly quadrupled in length, stretching to more than 1,100 pages in 2019. The Law Commission described the structure as ‘confusing’ and the numbering system as ‘inconsistent’. Moreover, it found duplication between different types of application and unnecessary repetition within categories.

On evidence, the Law Commission recommended a more flexible approach could involve providing a non-exhaustive list of examples and asking for any other document that meets requirements.

Issue: 7870 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll