header-logo header-logo

Referees, not spectators

31 May 2007 / Declan O’dempsey
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Local government , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Can local authorities correct misinformation issued by extreme parties during an election? Declan O’Dempsey reports

This article considers how local authorities can use their power to promote well-being and their duty to promote race equality to correct factually inaccurate information issued by extreme political parties. Local authorities sometimes worry whether they can correct such information during an election; I argue here that, unquestionably, a local authority not only has a right to do so, but an obligation.

The powers local authorities have in relation to research and information under the Local Government Act 1972 should provide them with the factual information they need to rebut any incorrect information. The Local Government Act 1986 (LGA 1986), s 2 and the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity set out some of the limitations on what they can do in this regard, although these relate principally to the form and content of the material.

A local authority which has a policy to counteract any inaccurate information put out by political parties at any time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll