header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / Declan O’dempsey
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Local government , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Referees, not spectators

Can local authorities correct misinformation issued by extreme parties during an election? Declan O’Dempsey reports

This article considers how local authorities can use their power to promote well-being and their duty to promote race equality to correct factually inaccurate information issued by extreme political parties. Local authorities sometimes worry whether they can correct such information during an election; I argue here that, unquestionably, a local authority not only has a right to do so, but an obligation.

The powers local authorities have in relation to research and information under the Local Government Act 1972 should provide them with the factual information they need to rebut any incorrect information. The Local Government Act 1986 (LGA 1986), s 2 and the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity set out some of the limitations on what they can do in this regard, although these relate principally to the form and content of the material.

A local authority which has a policy to counteract any inaccurate information put out by political parties at any time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll