header-logo header-logo

31 May 2007 / Declan O’dempsey
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Local government , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Referees, not spectators

Can local authorities correct misinformation issued by extreme parties during an election? Declan O’Dempsey reports

This article considers how local authorities can use their power to promote well-being and their duty to promote race equality to correct factually inaccurate information issued by extreme political parties. Local authorities sometimes worry whether they can correct such information during an election; I argue here that, unquestionably, a local authority not only has a right to do so, but an obligation.

The powers local authorities have in relation to research and information under the Local Government Act 1972 should provide them with the factual information they need to rebut any incorrect information. The Local Government Act 1986 (LGA 1986), s 2 and the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity set out some of the limitations on what they can do in this regard, although these relate principally to the form and content of the material.

A local authority which has a policy to counteract any inaccurate information put out by political parties at any time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll