header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / David Greene
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

The referral fee conundrum

Referral fees have always been a contentious subject for all those involved in the provision of legal services.

Referral fees have always been a contentious subject for all those involved in the provision of legal services. The concept of touting for business has always struck a nerve among the profession this side of the Atlantic. The question of paying third parties referral fees often gives rise to similar feelings and, as advertising has in the past, referral fees divide the profession.

Advertising or touting by solicitors was prohibited until 1987. While the ban for advertising was then lifted (much against the passionate efforts of many), solicitors were still prohibited from paying referral fees to third parties. That ban was partially lifted in 1988 but there remained a ban on paying referral fees to reward introducers of business. There were some slight amendments in 1991 but referral fees remained in the main banned until March 2004. 

In 2001 the Office of Fair Trading published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll